SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1038

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Trunks and Roots – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner Mr. Jamesh Bedi, Advocate.

ORDER :

Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.

By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 09.01.2023 passed by the learned District Magistrate, Jaipur by which the application filed by the petitioner under section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the SARFAESI Act of 2002') has been rejected.

2. By passing the impugned order dated 09.01.2023, the District Magistrate, Jaipur has observed in the order impugned that no document has been produced and annexed with the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act of 2002 with regard to the fact that whether the agricultural land was mortgaged or not and the DLC rates of the sanctioned land were not submitted. While rejecting the application filed by the petitioner, a liberty was granted to the petitioner to file fresh application with appropriate documents.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Magistrate has failed to peruse the provisions contained under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act of 2002. Counsel submits that while deciding the application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act of 200

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top