SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 439

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, PRANAY VERMA
Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rohit Saboo for petitioner;
Bhuwan Gautam, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the inaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khargone who is sitting tight over the application filed by the petitioner u/S 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002(referred to as”SARFAESI Act” hereinafter) praying for the following relief :

“It is therefore prayed that for the peculiar facts contained herein and ground raised, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate be directed to register the cases as listed in Annexure P-5 and dispose of then same within 30 days as prescribed in law.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a banking company involved in the business of advancing housing loans to its customers.The petitioner had filed an application u/S 14 of the SARFAESI Act before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khargone [referred to as CJM, Khargone” hereinafter]against one Mr. Badruddin & ors in the month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top