SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1798

ARUN BHANSALI
Rajendra Kumar Chahar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Achala Ram.
For the Respondents: Mr. K.K. Bissa.

ORDER :

Arun Bhansali, J.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking grant of benefit of I, II & III selection grade w.e.f. the date of their initial appointment and to revise their pay/pension/gratuity.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by order in Gulam Rasool Bisayati v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SBCWP No.18941/2018 and other connected matters, decided on 08.09.2022 and, therefore, the petitioners are also entitled to similar relief.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is not in a position to dispute that the issue, as raised, is squarely covered by order in the case of Gulam Rasool Bisayati (supra).

4. In the case of Gulam Rasool Bisayati (supra), a Coordinate Bench of this Court came to the following conclusion:-

    "For adjudication of the controversy in dispute, consideration of proviso 3 to Clause 3 of notification dated 25.01.1992 is essential. Proviso 3 reads as under:

    "Provided further that in the case of an employee who has been/ is declared surplus and absorbed against a new post either in the same or another department excluding absorption on higher post, the serv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top