SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1096

ARUN MONGA
Allahnoor Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.L. Deora.
For the Respondent: Mr. Harshwardhan Singh for Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, AAG.

ORDER :

Mr. Arun Monga, J. - The petitioner's grievance herein inter alia arises from the impugned order dated 31.07.2023 (Annex.16), vide which petitioner's representation was rejected by declining him the requisite bonus marks as per actual length of his work experience by excluding Sundays and Holidays from for the period he had worked. Ostensible ground in addition is that he has not provided any evidence whether he worked as a Lab Assistant or Lab Technician.

2. Relevant facts first. Petitioner since 13.11.2013 had been serving as a Lab Technician on a contractual basis and he applied for the post of Lab Assistant pursuant to an advertisement issued on May 29, 2018. The advertisement specified bonus marks for experience. The petitioner possesses 4 years, 7 months, and 15 days of work experience. Despite being listed for document verification and meeting the eligibility criteria, an office order dated September 5, 2019, forwarded incorrect work experience details by excluding Sundays and Holidays while calculating the total period of work experience. Multiple representations highlighting the petitioner's eligibility and correct bonus qua length of work experience, were turned a b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top