ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Rajendra Kasana – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of appeal regarding cognizance order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on mala fides and duplicity of prosecution (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondent's assertions regarding the propriety of cognizance (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. scope of appeal under sc/st act (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. differentiation of allegations between firs (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. trial court's jurisdiction and limits on examination of merits (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. outcomes of the appeal and orders made (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain, J. - The instant appeal under Section 14A(1) of SC/ST (POA) Act (hereinafter referred as "Act of 1989") aggrieved from an order of cognizance dated 21.9.2019 relating to FIR No. 234/2015, P.S. Mahila Thana, Alwar, whereby learned Special Judge (POCSO Act) No. 1, Alwar, after rejecting the FR, had proceeded to take cognizance against the appellants.
2. The fact in a nutshell that on 20.8.2015, an FIR No. 234/2015 was registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, District Alwar, on the complaint of a minor victim with the allegation that, when on 19.8.2015 around 11 a.m., the victim was alone at her home, both the appellants forcefully entered her room and tried to rape her. Po
T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala and Ors.
Inder Mohan Goswami and Anr. v. State of Uttaranchal and Ors.
The court reaffirmed that a cognizance order can be quashed if it lacks substantial basis and if allegations raised do not prima facie constitute an offence, highlighting the misuse of protective leg....
Cognizance under the SC/ST Act cannot be sustained if the informant is not a member of Scheduled Caste or if the involvement is merely circumstantial related to civil disputes.
The court clarified that taking cognizance of an offence requires applying judicial mind to the complaint, and mere examination of the complainant does not suffice.
Cruelty, criminal breach of trust and cheating – Order of Magistrate taking cognizance cannot be faulted only because it was not a reasoned order.
The court established that taking cognizance requires substantial evidence, particularly in cases involving allegations under the SC/ST (POA) Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.