SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1771

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Radha Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sanwarmal Gurjar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Vinay Mathur.
For the Respondents: Mr. C. S. Jodha.

Table of Content
1. appeal against tribunal's compensation award. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claims regarding errors in income assessment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's evaluation of income and compensation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. modified total compensation awarded. (Para 15)
5. final order and directions regarding compensation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)

ORDER :

(Ashutosh Kumar, J.)

The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants - claimants under section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 against the judgment and award dated 15.04.2013 passed by Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in MAC Case No.337/2012, whereby the learned Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.3,09,780/- to the appellants-claimants (hereinafter referred to as the 'claimants').

2. The claimants submitted a claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.47,00,000/-. On the basis of pleadings of the parties, the learned Tribunal framed the issues and evaluated the evidence on record. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition of the claimants and passed the impugned judgment and award. Hence, the present appeal.

3. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top