SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1785

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Prem Widow of Harna @ Harnarayan – Appellant
Versus
Islam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia, Adv.
For the Respondents:Mr. Sandeep Jain (for respondent- Insurance Company).

ORDER :

(Ashutosh Kumar, J.)

The instant appeal has been filed by the claimants-appellants under section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 against the judgment and award dated 25.05.2006 passed by Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal & Additional District and Sessions Judge, No.1 Kishangarh, District Alwar (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in MAC Case No.156/2004, whereby the learned Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.3,72,000/- to the claimants- appellants.

2. The claimants-appellants filed the claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.37,22,000/-. On the basis of pleadings of the parties, the learned Tribunal framed the issues and evaluated the evidence on record. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, learned Tribunal while deciding the claim petition, awarded the aforesaid amount as compensation in favour of the claimants- appellants.

3. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment and award dated 25.05.2006, the claimants-appellants filed this miscellaneous appeal for suitable enhancement of the amount awarded as compensation by learned Tribunal.

4. Brief facts of this case are that on 23.10.2004, one Harnarayan (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased') was travellin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top