SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1759

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
VIJAY BISHNOI, ASHUTOSH KUMAR, JJ.
Dharmendra Kumar Meena and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Ors. – Respondents
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 103 of 2018
Decided On : 07-08-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ail Mehta, AAG assisted by Mr. Yashodhar Panday.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Promotion of Scheduled Tribe employees - The appellants, employed as Patwari, were denied promotion to Inspector, Land Records solely on the ground of belonging to Scheduled Tribe category. The court found that the Single Judge misinterpreted the relevant notification regarding promotions. (Paras 2, 3, 8)

(B) Principle of equality - The appellants displayed grievance against discrimination in promotion practices based on caste. The court found that there's a precedent supporting their claim. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The appellants, belonging to Scheduled Tribe, claimed they were unjustly denied promotion due to their caste status. The learned Single Judge's dismissal of their writ petition was contested.

Findings of Court:
The appeal was allowed, and the order of the Single Judge was set aside, directing a review DPC based on proper grounds.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the appellants were rightfully denied promotion based on considerations of their caste.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the misinterpretation by the Single Judge, highlighting that the appellants were entitled to promotion and that caste should not be a basis for denial in light of existing directives.

Result: Appeal allowed. Respondents directed to consider promotion under specified guidelines.

ORDER :

This present appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the judgment dated 13.12.2017 passed in SB Civil Writ Petition No.19729/2017, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. The fact, which are not in dispute, are that the appellants are working as Patwari in the Revenue Department and they belong to Scheduled Tribe category. The grievances of the appellants is that they were not promoted to the post of Inspector, Land Records only on account of the fact they belong to the Scheduled Tribe category.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners while taking into consideration the notification dated 11.09.2011 of the Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan. It is further submitted that the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by misinterpreting the aforesaid notification. It is also submitted it appears that the learned Single Judge has passed the impugned order while treating that the appellants were earlier promoted and now they are seeking further promotion, whereas the fact remains that the appellants sought only first promotion on the higher post after being appointed as Patwari.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the controversy raised by the petitioners before the learned Single Judge was squarely covered by judgment dated 20.03.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in DB Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.1336/2011 (Satya Narain and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and other connected appeals.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants has also submitted that the Single Bench, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur has also taken a similar view in SB Civil Writ Petition Nos.11878/2015 and 14276/2013 decided on 09.01.2018 and 24.11.2020 respectively.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants, therefore, prayed that the instant appeal may kindly be allowed, the impugned order be set aside and the reliefs prayed for by the appellants may be granted.

7. Learned AAG appearing on behalf of the respondents has frankly admitted that the case of the appellants is to be considered in view of the subsequent notification issued by the Joint Secretary, Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur dated 18.10.2016 as the appellants have wrongly been denied promotion solely on the ground that they belong to the reserved category.

8. In view of the above, the instant appeal is allowed and the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 13.12.2017 is set aside.

9. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the appellants in the light of the communication dated 18.10.2016 passed by the Joint Secretary, Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur and hold a review DPC in consonance with the above communication within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and if the appellants are found entitled for promotion, they shall be granted all consequential benefits.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top