Back
PANKAJ BHANDARI, BHUWAN GOYAL
Sahab Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suspension of sentence application overview. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defence arguments against prosecution evidence. (Para 3) |
| 3. prosecution's rebuttal and victims' credibility. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. decision to suspend sentence. (Para 7) |
| 6. order for bail conditions. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
Accused-appellant has preferred this application for suspension of sentence.
2. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
3. It is contended by counsel for the appellant that the appellant has remained in custody for a period of more than six years. There is delay of three days in lodging of FIR. The samples which were drawn were not deposited in the malkhana and it is only after the arrest of the accused-appellant that the samples were sent to the FSL. It is also contended that it is a clear case of false implication for the very reason that the incident is said to have been taken place on 19.11.2016. Vaginal swab and vaginal smear was taken on 23.11.2016. In the report with regard to vaginal swab and vaginal smear, no human semen was detected. It is also contended that the underwear of the victim was recovered after arrest of accused on 17.12.2016, ther
The court upheld the conviction for sexual offenses based on credible victim testimony and corroborative medical evidence, stating that delay in identification does not negate the validity of the pro....
Accused’s conviction upheld due to corroborative victim testimony and DNA evidence, demonstrating the sufficiency of evidence in sexual offense cases.
Suspension of sentence and grant of bail – Societal concerned has to be kept in view in juxtaposition of individual liberty and societal concern deserve to be given priority over lifting restrictions....
The court established that delays in lodging FIRs and the credibility of witness testimonies are critical factors in determining the appropriateness of suspending sentences in criminal cases.
The court affirmed conviction based on corroborative evidence from FSL reports, despite contradictions in medical testimony, establishing that consistent witness accounts support the prosecution's na....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
