Satyendra Singh vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1908

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1908

PANKAJ BHANDARI, BHUWAN GOYAL
Satyendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. with Mr. Hem Bhushan Vedi, Mr. Nonit Hatila, Ms. Savita Nathawat, Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sudhir Jain, Mr. Parth Sharma, Mr. Monu Kumar, Mr. Parth Vashishth, Mr. Shivraj Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Javed Choudhary, AGA.

ORDER :

It is informed by learned Additional Government Advocate that victim has been intimated about filing of the appeal as well as suspension of sentence application. Despite information, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the victim.

2. Report in this regard has been submitted by the Additional Government Advocate and the same is taken on record.

3. Accused-applicants have preferred these applications for suspension of sentence.

4. Heard on applications for suspension of sentence.

5. It is contended by counsel for the applicant that applicants Nandu, Waseem and Kishan Jangam were on bail during trial and all have remained in custody for a period of more than five years. It is also contended that as per the report which was received by the Police; there was cross firing between the two groups. It is further contended that one firearm has been recovered from Nandu, however, as per the FSL report, the bullets were not fired with this firearm. The Court has wrongly interpreted this report. It is further contended that PW/2 is a related witness and PW/3 who is a friend of the deceased is a chance witness and the possibility of their being at the place of occurrence is doubtful

Click Here to Read the rest of this document