BIRENDRA KUMAR
Champa – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Singh – Respondent
ORDER :
Mr. Birendra Kumar, J. - The appellants are not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in motor accident claim case No. 91/2002 which was decided alongwith other claim cases vide impugned award dated 12.07.2005.
2. A brief background of the case is that on 10.07.2001 several passengers were traveling on Jeep bearing registration No. RJ-12-C-1020 from Sangwara towards Dungarpur. Near village Mojadhani, Upli mini truck bearing registration No. GJ-18/T-3456 came rashly and negligent towards the jeep and dashed, causing death of five persons. The dependents of different victims of death filed separate claim cases. The present one is in respect of death of Hajaram who was husband of appellant No. 1 and son of appellant Nos. 2 and 3 as well as father of appellant No. 5.
3. It is made clear that appellant No. 4 who is brother of the deceased and was not dependent on the deceased rather he was dependent on his alive parents therefore appellant No. 4 was not entitled to any compensation.
4. The case of the appellants is that at the time of death, Hajaram was aged about 30 years and he was earning Rs. 4,000/- per month, as he was a mason.
Janabai & Ors. v. M/s. ICICI Insurance Company Limited
Kamlesh and Ors. v. Atar Singh and Ors. reported in 2016 ACJ 1
Megma General Insurance CO. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram and Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Satendra & Ors. reported in (2021) 11 SCC 780
The court recalibrated compensation in a motor accident case, emphasizing accurate income assessment and reliance on eyewitness testimony over circumstantial evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the deceased's income, prospective income, and the liability of t....
The central legal point established is the assessment of just and reasonable compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering various factors such as future income, consortium, funeral expenses....
Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, deals with concept of 'just compensation' and same has to be determined on foundation of fairness, reasonableness and equitability on acceptable legal standar....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the proper assessment of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account the deceased's income, future prospects, and loss of con....
The court modified the compensation amount based on revised income assessment and contributory negligence, establishing clearer guidelines for future cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.