SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1866

DINESH MEHTA
Gurnam Singh Gill – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R.S. Choudhary
For the Respondent: Mali Ram Pareek

ORDER :

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to accord them benefits of pension/family pension, pursuant to the Employee's Pension Scheme, 1995.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents be directed to accord benefits to the petitioner in light of order in R.C. Gupta & Ors. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Ors. 2018 (14) SCC 809 and other judgments, which have followed the said judgment including a judgment of this Court.

3. The issues, which have been raised by the petitioner all stand concluded by Larger Bench Judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Employee Provident Fund Organization & Ors. v. Sunil Kumar B. & Ors. 2022 SCC Online SC 1521.

4. In the said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has directed as under:

    “46. We accordingly hold and direct:

    (i) The provisions contained in the notification no. G.S.R. 609(E) dated 22nd August 2014 are legal and valid. So far as present members of the fund are concerned, we have read down certain provisions of the scheme as applicable in their cases and we shall give our findings and directions on these provisions in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top