SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1873

DINESH MEHTA
Gavri Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pakaj Mehta, Sapna Kansara
For the Respondents: Ravi Panwar, Sunil Purohit, Mehardeen Mehar

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has made following prayers:

    “I. That the respondents may be directed to release the 50% amount in favour of the petitioner payable due to the death of the petitioner's son Shri Kush Mohan. The interest on the due amount may also be ordered to be paid to her.

    II. The respondents may further be directed that the 50% payment of GPF, Gratuity, state insurance, encashment leave/PL benefits may be paid to the petitioner.

    III. That respondents further may be directed to grant the proportionate pension to the petitioner looking to her need and health conditions.

    IV. That in case the pension amount is paid to the respondent No. 6 by the respondent department concerned, then she may be directed to pay the proportionate amount of pension and other monitory benefits may be ordered to the share equally between the petitioner and the respondent No. 6.

    V. Any other appropriate order of direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

2. The petitioner is mother of one Khushmohan Mehta, who served the Ayurved Department as a Class IV employee before passing away on 18.0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top