SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1883

DINESH MEHTA
Prathvi Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Devendra Mahalana
For the Respondent: Andaram Choudhary

ORDER :

1. This application for bail has been filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 324/2021 registered at Police Station Sardarshahar, District Churu for the offences under Sections 498A, 304B, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC').

2. Mr. Mahalana, learned counsel for the applicant invited Court's attention towards the charge-sheet and pointed out that charge-sheet has been filed alleging offence under Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC committed by the applicant regardless of the fact that allegation of harassment and demand of dowry is not supported by any cogent evidence.

3. Learned counsel raised a fundamental argument that the applicant cannot be prosecuted for offence under Section 304B of the IPC because neither in the postmortem report nor in the statement given by the doctor in the Court, it has come on record that the deceased died an unnatural death or she has committed suicide.

4. He highlighted that as per the evidence on record, the deceased had made an attempt to hang herself, but while she was still alive, the family members came to know of such attempt and immediately got her down of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top