SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2160

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Tara Chand – Appellant
Versus
Mst Gagadi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P. L. Sharma Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Abhi Goyal Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 12.11.2013 passed by this Court, whereby, while setting aside the judgment dated 18.12.1997 passed by the Board of Revenue, the status quo with regard to the disputed property was directed to be maintained during pendency of the suit.

2. Drawing attention of this Court towards the sale deed dated 29.11.2012 executed by some of the respondents/contemnors of the subject property, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have executed it despite order of this Court to maintain status quo and have, therefore, committed contempt of this Court. He, therefore, prays that the respondents may be directed to purge the contempt and they may also be punished suitably.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that since, their prayer in the temporary injunction application was confined to restraining the petitioner from dispossessing them from the subject property, the order of status quo would operate to that extent only. He, therefore, prays for dismissal of the contempt petition.

4. Heard. Considered.

5. In a revenue suit filed by the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top