SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2326

NUPUR BHATI
Jagdish Rai – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. J.K. Suthar.
For the Respondent: Mr. D.S. Thind

ORDER ;

(Nupur Bhati, J.)

Since, these misc. petitions involve common cause of action, thus, they are decided by a common order.

2. The petitioner has preferred these criminal misc. petitions with a prayer that the petitioner wants trial for all the offences committed in pursuant to the application filed under Section 219 of Cr.P.C. for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for bouncing of three cheques.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the three FIRs that have been lodged against the petitioner in respect to three cheques issued by the petitioner for the year 2016 and thus, all the three cases related to the offence of same kind and have been committed within 12 months. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in light of Section 219 of Cr.P.C., the complaints ought to have been directed to be consolidated and in support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the judgment dated 17.11.2012 passed in SBCRLMP No.1835/2011 titled as Chand Ratan v. Roop Chand.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent, opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, he submits t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top