State of Rajasthan vs Panchal Tent House

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1984

REKHA BORANA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Panchal Tent House – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Saransh Vij
For the Respondent: P.R. Kumawat

Table of Content
1. application under section 5 of the limitation act. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding condonation of delay. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observations on appeal filing dates. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. judicial principles on condoning delay under limitation act. (Para 7 , 8)
5. conclusion and order to condone delay. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

ORDER :

1. The matter comes upon an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act preferred by the appellants for condonation of delay of 276 days as reported by the office though disputed by the appellants.

2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the office has wrongly reported the appeal to be barred by 276 days treating the appeal to be filed on 01.03.2023 whereas the same was filed on 07.02.2023. Learned counsel further submitted that the delay caused in preferring the present appeal was bona fide as earlier the then Additional Advocate General was appointed and he was instructed to file the appeal in the present matter but subsequently vide letter dated 05.05.2022, directions were issued to the newly appointed Additional Advocate General as the State had made some changes in allotment of the departments as wel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document