SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972085

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KALYANI SANDUGU – Appellant
Versus
SATYA KUMAR RAO – Respondent


Reserved on 25.09.2025 Delivered on 09.10.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Appeal from Order No. 142 of 2025

With

Delay Condonation Application (IA 2 of 2025)

(under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963)

Kalyani Sandugu ………..Appellant/defendant

Versus

Satya Kumar Rao ….….Respondent/plaintiff ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the respondent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Mr. Alok Mahra, J.

The appeal from order has been preferred

against the order dated 28.02.2023 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Rishikesh, District Dehradun in Original Suit No. 68 of 2021, whereby the temporary injunction application filed by respondent/plaintiff has

been allowed.

2. There is a delay of 708 days’ in filing the present appeal from order. A delay condonation application (IA No. 2 of 2025) has been filed by the appellant/defendant to condone the delay of 708 days in

filing the appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant/defendant would submit that that the appellant has been suffering from severe motor paralysis an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top