HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KALYANI SANDUGU – Appellant
Versus
SATYA KUMAR RAO – Respondent
Reserved on 25.09.2025 Delivered on 09.10.2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Appeal from Order No. 142 of 2025
With
Delay Condonation Application (IA 2 of 2025)
(under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963)
Kalyani Sandugu ………..Appellant/defendant
Versus
Satya Kumar Rao ….….Respondent/plaintiff ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the respondent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon’ble Mr. Alok Mahra, J.
The appeal from order has been preferred
against the order dated 28.02.2023 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Rishikesh, District Dehradun in Original Suit No. 68 of 2021, whereby the temporary injunction application filed by respondent/plaintiff has
been allowed.
2. There is a delay of 708 days’ in filing the present appeal from order. A delay condonation application (IA No. 2 of 2025) has been filed by the appellant/defendant to condone the delay of 708 days in
filing the appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant/defendant would submit that that the appellant has been suffering from severe motor paralysis an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.