Back
REKHA BORANA
Ratan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Kanna Ji Dangi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs claim ancestral land rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against maintainability of suit. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's analysis on agricultural land and jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court dismisses appeal and applications. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER :
1. The present regular appeal has been preferred against the order dated 08.03.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.1, Udaipur in Civil Original Case No.9/2012 whereby the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure as preferred by defendants No.2 to 10 has been allowed and as a consequence, the suit for declaration, correction in the revenue record, partition and permanent injunction as preferred by the plaintiffs has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts are that the plaintiffs preferred a suit for the reliefs as abovementioned with a plea that the agricultural lands as mentioned in the plaint were the ancestral properties and being coparceners, they too have a share in the property. Therefore, they prayed for partition of the properties and further prayed for mutation in the revenue records and also for cancellation of the sale deeds and other transfer deeds as executed by the other coparcen
Civil courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate partition of agricultural land when no tenancy dispute exists, as per Section 242(1) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955.
A suit seeking cancellation of a sale deed based on the ground that the property in question was ancestral would be maintainable before the civil court. The sale deed was found to be voidable, making....
A sale deed executed without legal necessity concerning ancestral property is voidable, allowing civil court jurisdiction for cancellation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that if the allegations in the plaint make a case of the document being voidable, only the civil court would have jurisdiction to deal with the sai....
A Civil Court can entertain a partition suit despite the land being recorded as agricultural if the actual use has changed to residential, emphasizing that technicalities should not impede substantia....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, specifically regarding the jurisdiction of the civil cou....
Civil courts lack jurisdiction to challenge partition proceedings by revenue authorities unless a question of title arises or jurisdictional defects are alleged, as prescribed by Section 171 of the H....
Civil Courts cannot adjudicate matters concerning partition as per H.P. Land Revenue Act, Section 171, which restricts jurisdiction in partition disputes, asserting that remedy lies within revenue au....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
