SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2129

FARJAND ALI
Banwari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.D.S.S. Kharlia.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

JUDGMENT :

Farjand Ali, J.

The appellants have preferred the instant criminal appeal under Section 3 74 of the CrPC being aggrieved of the judgement dated 27.08.1994 passed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act CAses, Sri Ganganagar in Regular Criminal Case No.8/1994, whereby appellant Banwari Lal has been convicted for the offences under Sections 4 52 and 323 of the IPC and appellant Makhan Singh has been convicted for the offence under Section 4 52 of the IPC and they were released on probation under section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.3, 000/- along with a surety in the like amount. Each of the appellant was further ordered to deposit a sum of Rs.500/- as prosecution expenses and appellant Banwari Lal was ordered to deposit a sum of Rs.1000/- as compensation to be provided to the complainant.

2. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant appeal are that on 02.10.1991 Smt. Uda Devi and Smt. Sugna Devi submitted a report (Ex.P/2) to the SHO, Police Station Raisinghnagar, wherein it was stated that on 01.10.1991 in the night at about 10.00-10.30

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top