SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2138

FARJAND ALI
Jai Kishan Meena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ashvin Garg
For the Respondent: Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

Table of Content
1. overview of conviction and sentencing details. (Para 1)
2. arguments against conviction and sentencing. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's reasoning for suspension of sentence. (Para 4)
4. order for suspension of sentence granted. (Para 5)
5. conditions for bail and attendance in court. (Para 6)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

Heard learned counsel for the accused-appellant and learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence and perused the judgment impugned dated 06.08.2022 passed by Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur in Sessions Case No.134/2020 (CIS No.94/2019) whereby the accused-appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section(s) 365 & 376 IPC and has been sentenced with maximum of twenty years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that the trial court has grossly erred in convicting and sentencing the accused-appellant. It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the element of consent is easily inferable from the statement of the prosecutrix and the other relevant material. She is a major girl aged of 22 years. She admits in her s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top