JUDGMENT

Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J. - Also heard on I.A No.16600/2022 which is an application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C for suspension of sentence moved on behalf of appellant.

2. The appellant has been convicted for offence under Sections 506 (2) of IPC and under Section 11 r/w 012 of POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo 1-1 years with fine of Rs.1000 and 1000/- for each offence with default stipulations.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the matter. The learned trial Court has erred in not appreciating the fact that there are material omissions and contradictions in the version of the prosecution witnesses. The jail sentence of the appellant has been suspended by the Trial Court till 13.01.2023 and during bail he did not misuse the liberty granted to him. It is further submitted that there is no likelihood of hearing of appeal in near future. Hence, counsel prayed that application for suspension of sentence be allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand has opposed the application and prays for its rejection.

5. I n due consideration of the submissions made on behalf of the appellants, on peru