SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1940

INDERJEET SINGH
Shivlal – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Akash Gupta on behalf of Mr. Behari Lal Agarwal.
For the Respondent: Mr. Harsh Sharma.

ORDER :

(Inderjeet Singh, J.)

Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the learned Appellate Court, whereby, the application filed on behalf of the petitioners-non-applicants under Section 21(3) of the RAJASTHAN RENT CONTROL ACT , 2001 was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent-applicant filed eviction application against the petitioners-non-applicants before the learned Rent Tribunal. The learned Rent Tribunal vide its order dated 17.02.2020 allowed the eviction application. Being aggrieved by the order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, the petitioners-non-applicants filed a regular appeal before the Appellate Court. During the pendency of the said appeal, the petitioners-applicants filed an application under Section 21 (3) of the RAJASTHAN RENT CONTROL ACT , 2001, which was dismissed by the learned Appellate Court vide its order dated 19.04.2023. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners-non-applicants challenging the order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the learned Appellate Court.

3. Counsel for the petitioners-non-applicants submits that the learned Ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top