INDERJEET SINGH
Shivlal – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to eviction order and application dismissal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contention regarding ownership documents. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning for dismissal of writ. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 7) |
ORDER :
(Inderjeet Singh, J.)
Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the learned Appellate Court, whereby, the application filed on behalf of the petitioners-non-applicants under Section 21(3) of the RAJASTHAN RENT CONTROL ACT , 2001 was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent-applicant filed eviction application against the petitioners-non-applicants before the learned Rent Tribunal. The learned Rent Tribunal vide its order dated 17.02.2020 allowed the eviction application. Being aggrieved by the order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, the petitioners-non-applicants filed a regular appeal before the Appellate Court. During the pendency of the said appeal, the petitioners-applicants filed an application under Section 21 (3) of the RAJASTHAN RENT CONTROL ACT , 2001, which was dismissed by the learned Appellate Court vide its order dat
Appellate Rent Tribunal has allowed documents to be taken on record, while remanding matter back to learned Rent Tribunal.
The court established that failure to provide evidence of property exemption and procedural compliance can lead to dismissal of eviction challenges under the Rent Control Act.
The execution procedure under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act is distinct from the CPC, and repeated applications for similar relief constitute an abuse of process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.