Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Mohan Das – Appellant
Versus
Legal Representative of Late Kewal Chand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought in eviction case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's claims on ownership and inaccuracies in tribunal orders. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent's arguments supporting landlord-tenant relationship. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's review of case details. (Para 5) |
| 5. court's findings on landlord-tenant relationship. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. justification for not interfering with lower court's orders. (Para 11) |
| 7. conclusion: petition dismissal. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)
This writ petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
a. That the impugned judgment dated 13.10.2022 passed by the learned Rent Appellate Tribunal, Pali (Raj.) in Rent Appeal no.4/2013 and the judgment dated 08.01.2013 passed by the learned Rent Control Tribunal, Pali (Raj.) in Rent Control Case no.18/2008 may kindly be declared illegal and set aside with all consequential benefits.
b. That in the alternative it is also prayed that, if during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner is dispossessed from the presmises in question, then his posse
The court affirmed that a registered sale deed is decisive in establishing landlord-tenant relationships, overriding claims based on wills or agreements without proper legal standing.
Ownership does not automatically establish a landlord-tenant relationship without evidence of rent agreements or payments, as confirmed by the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011.
Appellate Rent Tribunal has allowed documents to be taken on record, while remanding matter back to learned Rent Tribunal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
