SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1360

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Kaloo Ram – Appellant
Versus
Radha Kishan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:- Mr. Vipin Makkad, Advocate.
For the Respondent:- Mr. Tarun Dudia, Advocate.

ORDER :

Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present first appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 20.05.1989 passed by the Additional District Judge No.2, Udaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial Court'), whereby the suit preferred by the petitioner was rejected.

3. Briefly noted the facts in the present case are that appellant- Kaloo Ram filed a suit for right of pre-emption against the respondents stating therein that respondent No.2- Narayan Lal had sold a part of house/haveli to the first appellant- Kaloo Ram through a registered sale deed dated 03.11.1978. Subsequently, another portion of the Haveli was also sold by the respondent No.2- Narayan Lal to the respondent No.1- Radha Kishan on 04.10.1979. The respondent No.1- Radha Kishan further sold some portion of the Haveli to the respondent Nos.3 and 4- Abdul Gani and Smt. Femida on 21.07.1980. It was pleaded in the suit that there existed a common passage between the properties of the first appellant i.e. Kaloo Ram and the respondent No.2- Narayan Lal, which is being used by the first appellant and the respondent No.2. It was further pleaded that the property, which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top