SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2330

MUNNURI LAXMAN
Roshan – Appellant
Versus
Dasrath Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sandeep Sarupariya, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sunil A Vyas, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Munnuri Laxman, J. - The challenge in the present appeal is to the award dated 27.03.2004 passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Salumbhar (ADJ No.2), Udaipur, on the file of M.A.C. Case No.306/2002, wherein and whereby the claim of the appellants for enhancing compensation was partly allowed granting a compensation of Rs. 2,42,400/- with interest.

2. The present appeal is filed by the claimants-appellants. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the claimants-appellants is that the Tribunal below has not appropriately awarded the compensation, more particularly the grant of benefit of future prospects by applying appropriate multiplier and deduction towards personal expenses and amounts awarded under conventional heads.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has contended that the Tribunal has rightly fixed the compensation considering the factors prevailing at that time and such a compensation requires no interference by this Court.

4. It is also the contention learned counsel for the Insurance Company that parents had separately filed a claim petition. The present claim petition and the claim petition preferred by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top