SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1210

PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Prabhulal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohit Khandelwal
For the Respondent: Mr. Imran Khan, PP

ORDER :

Praveer Bhatnagar, J.

Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 49/2024 registered at Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21, 25 & 29 of the NDPS Act, the petitioners have preferred these anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated under Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act. The accused-petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged offence and have been implicated in the case based upon the statements of the co-accused Ghanshyam, from whom possession of 100 gms. smack was recovered. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no substantive piece of evidence available on record against the accused-petitioners. He further submits that no custodial investigation of the accused-petitioners are required. He prays that the anticipatory bail of accused-petitioners may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications and submits that recovery of contraband article was effected from co-accused Ghanshyam and his disclosure statement name of the present petitioners was revealed. He further su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top