IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
KULDEEP MATHUR, J.
Jasraj - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan and ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2178 of 2023.
Decided on : 23-04-2024
ORDER :
Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, J. - By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-
2. The impugned FIR No.210/2021 lodged against the petitioner at PS Bali, District Pali for the offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323 and 34 of IPC reads as under:
^^lsok esa]
Jheku vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV egksn; ckyh
ifjoknh;k
Jhefr ghjh èkeZifRu tljkt ¼iq=h pqUuhykyth½ mez 49 o"kZ
tkfr es?koky fuoklhx.k&lsokMh gky&yq.kkok rglhy ckyh iqfyl Fkkuk ckyh rglhy ckyh ftyk ikyh& ¼jktLFkku½ eksckbZy uEcj 7665485317
cuke
vfHk;qDrx.k
1& tljkt iq= isekjketh
2& Jherh oèkq ifRu isekjketh reke vk;q ls o;Ld tkfrx.k & es?koky fuoklh lsokMh rglhy ckyh
ifjoknh;k vUrxZr èkkjk 498&,] 406] 323] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk
ekU;oj]
ifjokn;k dk ifjokn fo#) vfHk;qDrx.k fuEukuqlkj izLrqr gS
1- fd ifjoknh;k dk vfHk;qDrx.k ls bl izdkj ls ukrsnkjh gS fd vfHk;qDr la[;k ,d tljkt ifjoknh;k dk ifr gS] vfHk;qDr la[;k nks Jherh oèkq ifjoknh;k dh lkl gSA
2- fd ifjokfn;k Jherh ghjh dk fookg vkjksih tljkt iq= isekjketh us?koky fuoklh lsokMh rglhy ckyh ds lkFk vkt ls 28 o"kZ xzke & yq.kkok rglhy & ckyh esa lEiUu gqvk FkkA fookg ds le; ifjoknh;k ds ihgj okyks us ifjoknh;k Jherh ghjh dks viuh lkeZF;rk ls vfèkd L=hèku ds :i esa tosjkrks es dkuksa ls Vksihl] lksus dk Vhdk otu ,d rksyk] NMs pkUnh ds otu 30 rksyk] dUnkSjk pkUnh otu 40 rksyk] lksus ds ywax] pkUnh dh ekBh] cPPkh dk dUnksjk] iSjks dh ik;y] uFk lksus dh ukd vkèkk rksyk otu] vxqBh lksus dh vkèkk rksyk otu] otuh ?kj fodh dk lkeku ds :i esa crZu] isVh] izs'kj dqdj] d'khnk e'khu] flykbZ e'khu] lkbZfdy] diMs bR;kfn fn;s FksA
3- fd ifjoknh;k o vkjksih tljkt ds nkEiR; thou ls ,d iq= uke eqds'k ,oa ,d iq=h uke lqJh ;kf;dk dk tUe gqvk gSa ifjoknh;k dk nkEiR; thou dk dHkh Hkh lq[ke; ugh jgkA vkjksih ,ao mldh ekrk Jherh oèkq us fookg ds fnu ls gh ckFkÊ;k dks de lkeku o #i;s ykus] 'kknh esa ckjkfr;ksa dh vkoHkxr Bhd ढax ls ugh dj ukd dVkus bR;kfn ds fy, rax o ijs'kku djuk 'kq# dj fn;kA ifjoknh;k dh lkl Jhefr oèkq ds mdlkus ij vkjksih tljkt us ekjihV djuk 'kq: dj fn;kA vkjksihx.k tljkt o oèkq us ifjoknh;k dks mlds ihgj i{k ds o vU; yksxks ds lkeus de lkeku o #i;s ykus] 'kknh esa ckjfr;ksa dh vkoHkxr Bhd ढax ls ugha dj ukd dVkus bR;kfn ds fy, jax o ijs'kku dj tyhy o rkus nsrs jgrs gSaA vkjksih oèkq ds mdlkus ij vkjksih tljkt ifjoknh;k dks O;olk; djus ds fy;s ,d yk[k # ykus gsrq dgk FkkA ifjoknh;k ds fojksèk djus ij vkjksih Jherh oèkq ds }kjk mdlkus ij vkjksih tljkt us ifjoknh;k ds fojksèk djus ij ifjoknh;k ghjh dk lkjk L=hèku gMi dj ?kj ls fudky fn;k ftl ij ifjoknh;k }kjk Fkkukfèkdkjh ckyh ds le{k fyf[kr fjiksVZ izLrqr djus ij tljkt us ifjoknh;k Jherh ghjh ds lkFk fnukad 13@08@2019 dks vkilh fy[kr fu"ikfnr fd;kA ftlds rgr vkjksih tljkt ,ao ifjoknh;k Jherh ghjh us vyx vyx fuokl djuk r; fd;k Fkk ijUrq lekt ds eksftt yksxks dh le>kbZ'k ls o lUrkuksa ds Hkfo"; dks ennsutj j[krs gq, nksuksa us lkFk lkFk jguk djuk r; fd;k Fkk vkjksihx.k ds O;ogkj esa vkdfLed ifjorZu vk x;kA vkjksihx.k dk O;ogkj ifjoknh;k o mldh iq=h ;kfpdk ds izfr vksj vfèkd Øwj gks x;kA vkjksih tljkt ds }kjk ifjoknh;k o mldh iq=h ;kfpdk ds pfj= ij ykaNu yxkuk izkjEHk dj fn;kA ifjoknh;k ghjh xr rhu o"kks ls ;sfju lEcUèkh chekjh ls ihfMr gSA ifjoknh;k Jhefr ghjh dk xaxkjke gkfLiVy ubZ fnYyh ls bZykt tkjh gSA ifjoknh;k Jherh ghjh dks vkijs'ku dh l[r vko';drk FkhA ifjoknh;k Jherh gjh ds vkijs'ku ds fy, eFkqjknkl ekFkqj gkfLiVy tksèkiqj us fnukad 03@03@2020 eqdjZj dh FkhA ftu rF;ksa dh vkjksih tljkt dks Hkyh Hkkafr tkudkjh gS] vkjksih tljkt us nks ekg iwoZ gh izkFkhZ;k ds dCts ls bZykt lEcUèkh vko';d nLrost Nhudj izkFkÊx.k dks ?kj ls ckgj fudky fn;k] rkfd izkFkÊ la[;k ,d dk vkijs'ku ugha gksA vkjksih us ifjoknh;k dk vkijs'ku ugha gksus fn;kA ftldh fyf[kr fjiksVZ fnukad 29@09@2020 Fkkukfèkdkj
AI
The court cannot quash an FIR based on the correctness of allegations at the stage of Section 482 Cr.P.C. without sufficient grounds.
The court cannot quash an FIR based on allegations without assessing the correctness of those allegations at the initial stage.
The court found prima facie evidence of cognizable offences in the FIR, justifying the continuation of proceedings despite claims of false implication.
The scope for quashing FIRs under Section 482 of CrPC is limited and requires concrete grounds showing no cognizable offences are disclosed.
Point of Law : The remedies available in law for false and vexatious charges have also been highlighted in the said judgment to dissuade the High Courts from exercising powers under Section 482 CrPC.
The court cannot quash an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on the correctness of allegations, especially when serious cognizable offences are disclosed.
High Court should refrain from giving a prima facie decision unless there are compelling circumstances to do so.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.