SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2356

KULDEEP MATHUR
Pappu Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. N.K. Rastogi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Gaurav Singh, P.P.

ORDER :

Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.732/2023 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara for the offence under Section 380 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner is triable by Court of Magistrate. Learned counsel submitted that no recovery is due to be made from the present petitioner; the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period.

3. On these grounds, he implored the court to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner is triable by Court of Magistrate.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top