SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2174

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Kumbh Singh @ Kirat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: J.V.S. Deora
For the Respondent: Vikram Sharma

ORDER :

1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No. 2 even in the second round.

2. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 16.07.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Jodhpur, Distt. Jodhpur in Sessions Case No. 7/2021 whereby, the learned Special Judge dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 311 Cr.P.C for cross-examining the victim.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cross-examination of the victim could not be done because the counsel for the accused-petitioner appearing before the trial court was under impression that the parties have entered into a compromise. Despite request for adjournment, the trial court closed the opportunity of the petitioner to cross-examine the victim and also dismissed the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is facing the trial under the POCSO Act so the victim is a material witness and if the petitioner is not allowed to cross-examine the victim, he will suffer irreparable loss and shall be deprived of opportunity to prove his innocence. The learned trial court without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top