Back
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Praveen Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner accused challenging the order dated 10.1.2023 passed by learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur Metropolitan in relation to the FIR No. 655/2022 registered at the Police Station Kudi Bhagtasani, Jodhpur, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for having narco analysis, brain mapping and polygraph tests conducted upon the petitioner, has been rejected.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant filed a written report on 13.11.2022 to the effect that on 26.09.2022 at about 6 PM, the petitioner forcibly entered into the house of the complainant and demanded sum of Rs. 60 lacs and on 12.11.2022, the accused petitioner threatened to kill him.
3. On the basis of this information, an FIR No. 655/22 was registered at the Police Station Kudi Bhagtasani for the offences under Sections 144 , 452, 386 and 387 I.P.C. and investigation commenced.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case and no such incident has happened. The complainant owed money from the petitioner which he had loaned her for purchasing crusher so also mining lease. The co
Compelling scientific tests violates constitutional rights against self-incrimination; consent is mandatory.
Consent of accused is essential for conducting scientific tests in criminal investigations; involuntary testing violates constitutional protections against self-incrimination.
Point of law: Narco Analysis Tes -Even if the petitioner voluntarily submits for subjecting himself for Narco Analysis Test, there is no guarantee that the statements would be voluntary. So even if t....
(1) Narco-analysis test – Forceful subjection of an individual to techniques, such as narco-analysis test, violates personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of Constitution of India – While need f....
Applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C.
DNA test is also available before the Court, which is marked as Annexure-H and only in order to overcome the positive report of the DNA, the petitioner has approached this Court by invoking the writ ....
The court emphasized the right to a fair trial, allowing a petitioner to re-open defense for self-examination, contingent on cost payment to the complainant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
