SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2263

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Ram Kishore Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: D.N. Yadav
For the Respondents: M.S. Bhati, Kalu Ram Bhati, R.S. Mankad

ORDER :

1. Instant misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 01.03.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Jodhpur Metropolitan whereby, the learned Additional Sessions Judge upheld the order dated 26.02.2018 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate No. 9, Jodhpur Metropolitan rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under Section 142 (1) & 142(2) of the N.I. Act.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner under section 138 of the N.I. Act before Additional Civil Judge(JD) and Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 1 Jodhpur Metropolitan. The Additional Civil Judge (JD) and Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I) Act Cases) No. 1 Jodhpur Metropolitan, took cognizance for offence under Section 138 N.I. Act against the petitioner. The petitioner moved an application dated 23.12.2017 under Section 142 (1)(2) N.I. Act read with Section 461 (k)(l) Cr.P.C stating therein that the complaint was not lodged within the local/territorial jurisdiction of paying bank, which amounts to violation of mandatory provisions of section 142(2) and 142A of the N.I. Act. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top