SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1526

REKHA BORANA
Janta W/o Late Khimaram – Appellant
Versus
Kanaram S/o Hakaji – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mudit Vaishnav
For the Respondent: A.K. Dhadhich

ORDER :

1. Admit. Issue notice.

2. Service on respondent Nos. 1 & 2 is dispensed with at the risk of the appellants.

3. Learned counsel Mr. A.K. Dhadhich has put in appearance for respondent No. 3 Insurance Company. Service is hence, complete.

4. Both the counsels unanimously submitted that the appeal be finally heard at this stage itself.

5. The present misc. appeal has been filed by the appellants-claimants seeking enhancement of the compensation amount awarded vide judgment dated 25.07.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Barmer in MAC Case No. 190/2008.

The learned Tribunal, vide impugned judgment dated 25.07.2011 awarded a sum of Rs. 5,31,600/- in favour of the claimants alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of claim petition i.e. 20.09.2008.

6. Brief facts of the case are that a claim petition was preferred by the claimants with the submission that on 25.07.2008, Tilokaram was driving a mini truck bearing registration No. RJ-04-G -1843 from Barmer to Dhorimana on National Highway 15. The truck of respondent No. 1 bearing registration No. RJ-04-GA-2129 was parked negligently in the middle of the highway without any indicators. At about 11:00 pm, due

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top