Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Paramjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Gurcharan Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sudeepti Sharma, J.
1. This is an old matter pertaining to the year 2006 but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the Insurance Company.
2. Previously vide order dated 18.07.2024 in FAO No.1682 of 2007, this Court had already issued directions to the Insurance Companies that in the event, any of their empanelled counsel fails to appear, the Court would request the counsel empanelled with the Insurance Companies, who is present in the Court to assist in the matters. Further, the concerned Insurance Companies were directed to disburse the current scheduled fees to the counsel engaged by this Court for assisting in the matters.
3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3-Insurance Company.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants has handed over copy of the paper- book alongwith relevant record to the learned counsel for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.
5. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 27.03.2008 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bathinda (for short, 'the Tribunal') for enhancement of compe
The judgment clarifies compensation adjustments due to insufficient assessment of income and deductions under motor vehicle accident claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
