SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1639

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Arun Monga, J.
Gordhan Lal Soni S/o Ramniwas Soni and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP and ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7477/2024
Decided On : 24-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Chetan Prakash Soni, Smt. Sarita Soni.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP.

IMPORTANT POINT
Judicial Magistrates must apply scrutiny before directing FIR registration to prevent misuse of the criminal justice system in familial disputes.

Headnote:

(A) BNSS - Section 175 - Judicial Magistrates must exercise caution in directing police to register FIRs, ensuring a prima facie case exists. The court emphasized the need for judicial scrutiny to prevent misuse of the criminal justice system in familial disputes. (Paras 10.1, 12.1, 18.2)

(B) FIR - Allegations of fraud and conspiracy in familial disputes must be substantiated with credible evidence. The court found the allegations to be civil in nature, lacking the ingredients of criminal offences. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:

The complainant alleged that her son-in-law and daughter conspired to defraud her of money and valuables, leading to the registration of an FIR. The court found the FIR to be an abuse of process of law.

Findings of Court:

The court quashed the FIR, stating that the allegations did not constitute criminal offences and highlighted the need for careful judicial oversight in family disputes.

Issues: The main issues were whether the allegations constituted a criminal offence and the proper application of judicial mind by the Magistrate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the FIR was registered without proper judicial scrutiny, emphasizing the importance of verifying the truthfulness of allegations in familial disputes.

Result: FIR quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Arun Monga, J.

1. The case in hand illustrates the fallacious practice often followed by the Judicial Magistrates in directing police officials to register FIRs, invoking their power under section 175 of the BNSS [corresponding with section 156 of the Cr.P.C.], in a mechanical manner and without due application of judicial mind, even if the ingredients of the alleged offences are not made out. Such perfunctory approach, in turn, puts the civil liberties of the accused persons at risk, forcing them to seek bail as suspects—either anticipatory, alternatively, regular—if they have been arrested following the registration of the FIR and, if charge sheet already filed, then as an undertrial, face the harassment, humility and agony of trial in Courts.

2. Petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3 are son-in-law, daughter and grand-daughter (being the daughter of petitioners No. 1 and 2), respectively of the complainant/respondent No.2. They seek quashing of FIR No. 266 dated 27.09.2024, PS Kotegate, Bikaner registered against them for alleged offences under Sections 420/406/120B IPC and consequential proceedings.

FACTS

3. Factual narrative as per translated version of the impugned FIR is as below :-

    “Today, on 27.09.2024, following complaint was received through post under Section 175 (3) (BNSS) from the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner, filed by complainant Smt. Kamla Devi, wife of late Shyam Sunder caste Soni, age 72 years, resident of K.G. Complex, behind Durga Mata Temple, Police Station Kotegate, Bikaner, under Sections 420, 406, 120B of the IPC.

    x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

    In the court of Chief Judicial Magistrat, Bikaner.

    Kamla Devi, wife of late Shyam Sunder caste Soni, age 72 years, resident of K.G. Complex, behind Durga Mata Temple, Bikaner. - Complainant

    versus

    1. Gordhan Lal Soni, son of RamniwasSoni, resident of ChhotiKhatu, Barla Bazaar, District Nagaur.

    2. Shobha Devi, wife of Gordhan Lal Soni, resident of ChhotiKhatu, Barla Bazaar, District Nagaur.

    3. Lalita Soni daughter of Gordhan Lal Soni resident of ChhotiKhatu, Badla Bazar, District Nagaur.

    Accused

    Complaint under section 175 (3) BNSS Section 61, 316 (2), 318 (4) BNS.

    Sir,

    The complaint is being presented as below :-

    1. I, the complainant, Kamla Devi wife of late Shyamsundar caste Soni, age 70 years, resident behind K.G. Complex, behind Durga Mata Temple, Bikaner, am a widow. I have two sons and four daughters.

    2. One of my sons Bhavani died in an accident and my daughter Shobha was married to Gordhan Lal Soni of ChhotiKhatu who is my eldest son-in-law and the family had placed trust in Shobha and her husband.

    3. In the past the accused persons had defrauded me, which caused a family rift. After my husband’s demise, they sought forgiveness, seemingly to regain my trust. However, there was a big conspiracy behind their settlement i.e. their intention to usurp my property and my wealth (money, gold, silver). Same gradually became apparent to me and I got to know the real faces of these two.

    4. That after the death of my husband and son Bhavani, I was left alone. Therefore, my daughter Shobha and her husband Gordhan Lal Soni used to come to meet me. After the death of my husband and son, I was under deep shock due to which I was unable to think much.

    5. That my son-in-law Gordhan Lal Soni came to Bikaner on 21.01.2021 and called me and said that he wanted to buy a camera and I should bring 1 lakh rupees to him at KEM Road. I, the complainant, reached KEM Road with one lakh rupees and made the payment for the camera for Gordhan ji. Gordhan ji then gave the camera to his son Lalit and sent him to Khatu.

    6. On 21.05.2021, Gordhan ji again came to my house and asked for two lakh rupees from me for his personal need. I again gave two lakh rupees to Gordhan ji. He stayed at my house that night and left with two lakh rupees in the morning on 22.05.2021.

    7. That on 21.09.2021 my daughter Shobha and son-in-law Gordhan Lal Soni along with their 5-year-old grand son came to my house, then stayed here on 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top