Rajasthan High Court
Shinghal, J.
In the Matter of the Stoneware Pipe & Sanitary Fittings Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Jaipur - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
S.B. Company Suit No. 2 of 1968
Decided On : September 24, 1971
2. The managing agents pursued their efforts to obtain allotment of a plot of land to the Company, in the industrial area, for the setting up of the Companys factory. Plot No. 3 which is the suit plot, was allotted for the purpose. The managing agents then addressed letter Ex 3 dated April 25, 1946 to the Director of Industries and Commerce for delivery of possession of the plot. The Director conveyed the sanction for the sale of that plot measuring 450 ft x 483 ft. for the establishment of a factory, at the rate of annas 4 per square yard. A sum of Rs. 6,114/13/6 was accordingly deposited by the plaintiff against cash receipt Ex 5 dated September 6, 1947. Possession of the plot was given to the plaintiff and it provided a wire fencing where necessary. The plaintiff has contended that it then became the full owner, in possession, of the suit plot.
3. The plaintiff has stated further that it constructed roads, buildings, sheds etc in and over the suit plot, installed machinery and other equipment at a cost of about Rs. 58,956/4/- and started the production. Its grievance is that although it was the owner in possession of the suit plot, the Urban Improvement Trust, defendant No. 2, illegally and forcibly occupied an area measuring 340 ft x 483 ft (18246| square yards) in May, 1958. That area has been marked ABFE in site-plan Ex 8, while the entire area purchased by the plaintiff has been marked ABCD in that plan. Shri Rampal Singh, who was a shareholder and ex-director of the Company, held a discussion with the Organizer, Industrial States. Industries and Supplies Department, in that connection, and the Organizer sent him reply Ex. 9 dated January 3, 1959 enquiring about his expectation of the price for the total area, excluding the area enclosed by the factory. While these efforts to recover the land were going on, an extra-ordinary meeting of the members of the Company was held on August 31, 1961 in which the aforesaid decision was taken to wind it up voluntarily and to appoint Shri Ramgopal Chokhani as the liquidator. Shri Chokhani found letter Ex. 11 of April 1962 pasted on the factory premises stating that as the plaintiff was under liquidation and had not fulfilled the conditions on which the land was alloted and there was no chance of the land being utilised for the purpose for which it was allotted, it stood forfeited its possession resumed by the Government with effect from the date of the order. Shri Chokhani lodged a protect under letter Ex. 12 dated April 23, 1962, but did not receive a reply. The plaintiff then gave a notice under sec. 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on June 30, 1962.
4. When the Official Liquidator took over the winding up proceedings under the supervision of the Court, he gave a notice (Ex 14) to the authorities concerned under sec. 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure on December 22/30, 1965. No reply was received, and the Official Liquidator advertised the sale of the plot by public auction, along with the
(1) Director of Rationing and Distribution vs. Corporation of Calcutta ( AIR 1960 SC 1355 )
(3) Union of India vs. Jubbl ( AIR 1968 SC 360 )
(4) Pandit Ramchander vs. Pandit Maharaj Kunwar ( AIR 1939 All. 611 )
(10) Ettapparambath Atiyandi Pakkirichi Umma vs. Kaiprath Kalandan ( AIR 1954 Mad. 702 )
(17) Delhi Motor Co. vs. U. A. Basrurkar ( AIR 1968 S.C 794 )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.