SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 361

H. C. P. TRIPATHI
Mangal Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S. S. Tewari, Advocate, For the Appellant / N. A. Rahman, Advocate, for the Opposite Party

JUDGMENT

H. C. P. Tripathi, J. - This revision is directed against an order of the learned Sessions Judge, Etawah, upholding on appeal the applicants conviction and sentence of 6 months rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 200/- as fine under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act as recorded by a Magistrate First Class on June 11, 1963.

2. According to the prosecution, the applicants house was raided by the Excise Staff who were accompanied by the witnesses on September 21, 1962 at about 10 a.m. on the basis of a search warrant which had been issued by a Magistrate, First Class of the district. On the personal search of the applicant 17 packets of opium weighing about two chataks were recovered from the pockets of his bandi and on a search of the house, from a room which was unlocked by the applicant, a jhola was recovered which contained 6 chataks of opium. A scale and some weighment measures were also found in the room. The two Excise Inspectors P.W. 1 and P.W. 2 who had conducted the search immediately examined the recovered opium and found it to be illicit. Thereafter, the opium was duly sealed in the presence of the witnesses and a recovery memo was prepared. The applicant was prosecuted on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top