LODHA, JOSHI
Abdullah – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The learned Additional Advocate General has stated before us at the very outset that in the present circumstances the petitioner is not being deported to Pakistan on account of continuance of hostility between India and Pakistan, but that he shall remain confined in Inter
(19) A G. Kazi vs. C.V. Jethwani ( AIR 1967 Bom 235 )
(1) Mohd. Ikram Hussain vs. State of U.P. ( AIR 1964 SC 1625 )
(10) Govt of A.P. vs Mohd Khan ( AIR 1962 SC 1778 )
(11) Md. Ayub vs. Comm. of Police ( AIR 1965 SC 1623)
(12) State of MP. vs. Peer Mohd. ( AIR 1963 SC 645 )
(13) State of U.P. vs. Rahmatullah ( AIR 1971 SC 1382 )
(18) Satwant Singh Sawhney vs. D. Ramarathnam
(21) State of Bihar vs. Kumar Amar Singh ( AIR 1955 SC 282 )
(27) Kulathi Mammu vs. State of Kerala ( AIR 1966 SC 1614 )
(14) Mst. Allah Bandi vs. Govt. of Union of India ( AIR 1954 All. 456 )
(15) Sharafat Ali Khan vs. State of U.P. ( AIR 1960 All. 637 )
(16) Mukhtar Ahmad vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1965 All. 191 )
(26) Shree Mohd. Yusuf vs. Union of India ( AIR 1967 Pat. 266 )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.