SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 314

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, B. P. SINHA, J. C. SHAH, K. C. DAS GUPTA, K. N. WANCHOO
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Peer Mohd – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, Shroff

Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. : A charge-sheet was presented by the appellant-the State of Madhya Pradesh against the respondents Peer Mohammad and his wife Mst. Khatoon under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 (hereinafter called the Act) read with clause 7 of the Foreigners Order, 1948 (hereinafter called the Order) in the Court of the Magistrate 1st Class, Burhanpur. The case against the respondents was that they had entered India on May 13, 1956, on the strength of a Pakistani passport and a visa issued in their favour on May 8, 1956 and reached Burhanpur on May 15, 1956. Even after the period of the visa had expired, they continued to stay in India. Consequently, the District Magistrate, Burhanpur, served a notice on them on May 14, 1957 calling upon them to leave India on or before May 28, 1957. The respondents did not comply with the notice and by their unauthorised and illegal overstay in India, they rendered themselves liable under Section 14 of the Act and clause 7 of the Order.

2. The respondents pleaded that they were not foreigners but were citizens of India. They were born in India at Burhanpur and had been permanent residents of the said place; and so, the present cr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top