SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Raj) 12

JAIN, TYAGI
Hanuman – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Than Chand Mehta, for Appellants; N.M. Singhvi, for State

JAIN, J.—The three appellants and one Jai Singh were tried for offence under the Indian Penal Code and Indian Arms Act by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Sri Ganganagar. As a result of the trial, Sadhu Singh was convicted under sec.302 I.P.C. and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was however acquitted of the charge under sec. 27 Indian Arms Act. Sohan Singh and Hanuman were acquitted for charge under sec. 302 I. P. G. but each one of them was convicted under sec. 25, Indian Arms Act and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment. Jai Singh was acquitted of all the charges levelled against him. The three convicts have filed appeal No. 704/71 seeking their acquittal. The State of Rajasthan has also preferred a revision application praying for the award of extreme penalty of death to Sadhu Singh.

2. The prosecution evidence disclosed that Sher Singh (P.W. 11) resident of village Guda Beeruwala Tehsil Sirsa District Hissar had two murrabbas of land in village Nethrana, Tehsil Bhadra, Rajasthan. With a view to help him in the cultivation of the said land he took one Tulsi as his partner to cultivate with him. After sometime Tulsi started claiming the land as his own. Some how.































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top