DUTT
Moti Lal – Appellant
Versus
Sardar Mal – Respondent
2. The relevant facts giving rise to the suit for redemption, out of which this appeal arises, may be described as follows—
Sardar Mal and his son Sujan Mal filed a suit for redemption of a shop in dispute situated in Sire Bazar, Jodhpur, on the basis of a mortgage-deed (Ex. 25) executed by Mst. Bugi widow of Ladu Ram in favour of Chunni Lal Baheti on Falgun Sudi 10 Samvat-year 1957 (28.2.1901). The suit was filed against Manak Lal and Moti Lal sons of Gianni Lal and their mother Mst. Dhapi Bai alias Tuls
(4) K.V. Subharaju vs. G. Subharaju (AIR 1968 SC 947)
(6) D. Pattabhiramaswamy vs. S. Hanymayya (AIR 1959 SC 57)
(8) Ramchandra vs. Ramalingam (AIR 1963 SC 302)
(14) Kishorilal vs. Mt. Chaltibai (AIR 1959 SC 504)
(20) K. Govindan vs. T.T. Lakshmi Amma (AIR 1959 SC 71)
(21) Pearey LaL vs. Rameshwar Das (AIR 1963 SC 1703)
(29) Srinivas vs. Narayana (AIR 1954 SC 379)
(30) Raghunath vs. Ganesh (AIR 1964 SC 234)
(31) Shripad vs. Dattaram (AIR 1974 SC 878)
(33) Krishnamurthi vs. Dhruwaraj (AIR 1962 SC 59)
(10) Mt. Binda Kuer vs. Lalita Prasad (AIR 1936 P.C. 304)
(11) Seetharama Chandra Row vs. Kanchumarthl Raju alias Venkata Krishna Row) (AIR 1925 PC 201)
(15) Govind Ram vs. Abdul Wahab (1963 RLW 45b)
(16) Narayan vs. The Chamber of Commerce Ltd Kishangarh (1969 RLW 107)
(17) Dbanna LaL vs. Govinda Raja (AIR 1961 Mad. 262)
(18) Munnalal Ms Kashibai (AIR 1947 P.C. 15)
(23) Harendra Lal Roy vs. Haridasi Debi (AIR 1914 P.C. 67)
(25) Krishna Murthi vs. Krishna Murthi (AIR 1927 PC 139)
(26) Jivaji Annaji vs. Hanmant Ramchandra (AIR 1950 Bom. 360 (F.B.))
(28) Venkatanarayana vs. Subbammal (AIR 1915 PC 37)
(32) Anant Bhikappa vs. Shankar Ramchandra (AIR 1943 P.C. 196)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.