GUPTA, SHRIMAL
Milapchand Kanungo – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
2. When these petitions were set down for hearing before us, at the outset, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State of Rajasthan and Mr. S. K. Mal Lodha, appearing for the Union of India, raised preliminary objections to the maintainability of these writ petitions and to the jurisdiction of this Court to hear and decide them. As the preliminary objections raised on behalf of the respondents in respect of all these writ petitions are identical and as common arguments have been adv
(2) Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru vs. State of Kerala (AIR 1973 SC 1461)
(3) Makhan Singh Tarsikka vs. The State of Punjab (AIR 1964 SC 381)
(4) Mohan Chowdhary vs. The Chief Coram.
(5) State of Maharashtra vs. Prabhakar Pandurang Sanzgiri (AIR 1966 SC 424)
(6) K. Ananda Nambiar vs. The Chief Secretary (AIR 1966 SC 657)
(7) Ram Manohar Lohia vs. The State of Bihar (AIR 1966 SC 740)
(8) Durgadas Shirali vs. Union of India (AIR 1966 SC 1078;
(9) G. Sadanandan vs. State of Kerala (AIR 1966 SC 1925)
(10) Jaichand Lal Sethia vs. The State of West Bengal (AIR 1967 SC 483)
(11) State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Thakur Bharat Singh (AIR 1967 SC 1170)
(17) District Collector of Hyderabad vs. M/s. Ibrahim and Co. (AIR 1970 SC 1275.)
(18) Bhut Nath Mate vs. The State of West Bengal (AIR 1974 SC 806)
(19) Dwarka Nath vs. Income Tax Officer (AIR 1966 SC 81)
(20) A.K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras (AIR 1950 SC 27)
(25) P.L. Lakhanpal vs. Union of India (AIR 1967 SC 243)
(29) Srimati Indra Nehru Gandhi vs. Shri Rajnarain (AIR 1975 SC 2299)
(30) Mohd. Maqbool Damnoo vs. The State of Jammu and Kashmir (AIR 1972 SC 963)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.