SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Raj) 34

SHRIMAL
Maggi Bat – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.R. Singhvi, for Appellant; S.K. Mal Lodha, for Respondeat

SHRIMAL, J.—-This second appeal In execution proceedings by Maggi Bai is directed against the judgment dated December 9, passed by the learned Additional District judge No 1, Jodhpur, whereby he set aside the order dated November 12, 1975 passed by Munsiff City, Jodhpur in Execution Case No. 83 of 1975. By the same order he reminded the case back to the learned Munsiff and directed him to-enquire as to whether the landlords case was covered by sec. 14(2) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 (herein* after referred to as the Act) as amended by the Act No. 14 of 1976 If covered thereunder, he was asked to proceed to execute the decree by delivering the possession to the land-lord in accordance with the law but not otherwise. The facts giving rise to this appeal are that the appellant Is the landlord of a shop situated in Ada Bazar, Jodhpur, rented out by her to Sitaram-respondent. The appellant Maggi Bai filed a suit for eviction against the respondent on a number of grounds including the ground of personal necessity. The suit was decreed on the ground of personal necessity by the learned Munsiff, City, Jodhpur on Novenber 29, 1971 and a decree for ejectme














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top