SEN
Narayan Hari Shanker – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The petitioners, who are commission agents and grain merchants, challenge the validity of the levy of the market fee and the requirement of licensing of dealers by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Chhabra, under sections 14 and 17 of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1971.
3. The writ petitions fell into three groups. Writ petition Nos. 956, 959 and 960 of 1976 are directed against an order of the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Chhabra, dated April 28, 1975 requiring the licensing of dealers engaged in the business of purchase and sale of agricultural produce in the market area making a demand for payment of market fees i. e., before the establishment of the principal market yard at Chhabra or a sub-yard at Chhipabarod. Writ petitions Nos. 136 and 137 of 1977 challenge the validity of Notification No. F.10 (24)/Agr.Gr.-2/75 dated October 14, 1976, issued by the State Government under sec. 9(2)(b) of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to be "the Act") for the establishment of the principal market yard at Chhabra and sub-mark
(1) Mohammed Hussain Gulam Mohammed vs. State of Bombay (AIR 1962 SC 97)
(2) Lakhan Lal vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1968 SC 1408)
(8) Ratilal Panachand Gandi vs. State of Bomby (AIR 1954 SC 388)
(9) Hingir Rampur Coal Co. Ltd.
(11) State of Maharashtra vs. Salvation Army Western India Territory (AIR 1975 SC 846)
(3) M/s. Bhanwarlal Sohanlal vs. State (1966 RLW 339)
(4) Kundanmal Bastimal vs. State of Rajasthan (1974 RLW 263)
(7) Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments
(10) Corporation of Calcutta vs. Liberty Cinema (AIR 1965 SC. 1107)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.