DWARKA PRASAD, P.C.JAIN
Commercial Taxes Officer, (Revision), Ajmer – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Satish Chand & Co. , Jaipur – Respondent
2. The question which arises for consideration in this revision petition is as to whether empty cable drums would fall within the expression "packing materials" occurring in the Notification issued by the State Government on March 27, 1971 and so would be taxable at the rate of 3% and not at the general rate of 7%.
3. M/s. Sitaram Satish Chand and Company (hereinafter called the Assessee) deals in the sale of cable drums, empty wooden boxes and other items. The Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer, Ward II, B Circle, Jaipur, while as easing the turnover of the assessee for the assessment year 1973-74. relatable to the period December 17, 1972 to October
(1) Megh Raj vs. Allah Rakhia (AIR 1947 P.C. 72)
(2) State of Tamil Nadu vs. Pyare Lal Malhotra (1976 37 STC 319)
(5) Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
(6) Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
(9) Ramavatar Budhai Prasad vs. The Assistant Sales Tax Officer
(10) State of Gujrat vs. Sakarwala Brothers (1967 19 STC 24)
(12) M/s Chohan Pan Bhandar vs. The Assistant Sales Tax Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.