M.P.SINGH
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Kumher Inquiry Commission – Respondent
(1) the case diaries of case Nos. 220, 222, 223, 226, 227, 228, 229 and 230 of 1992 of the Police Station-Kumher;
(2) Rojnamchas containing wireless messages sent by and received at the Police Station Kumher on 1.6.92 & 2.6.92;
(3) the report of the Intelligence Branch, Joint report of the Collector and Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur, and inspection thereof may be allowed to the parties;
(4) the report of the Additional Superintendent of Police C.I.D. (Spl. Branch), Bharatpur Zone, containing some material which shall not be in the public interest to be disclosed and this part may not, therefore, be revealed to the parties;
(5) The C.I.D. was also directed to produce the case-diaries Nos. 210, 218 and 219 of 1992;
(6) the inspection was to be carried out by the parties in the presence of the Secretary or the Dy. Secretary of the Commission. The parties shall not be entitled to copies of any of these documents, certified or uncertified, except the First Information Reports
(1) Khatri vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1981 SC 1068)
(3) Mukund Lal vs. Union of India (AIR 1989 SC 144)
(6) M/s. Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (AIR 1988 SC 782)
(7) S.P. Gupta vs. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 149)
(2) Mahabirji Birajman vs. Prem Narain Shukla (AIR 1965 All 494)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.