SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 175

B.S.CHAUHAN
Ratan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
None present, for Petitioner R.K. Purohit, for Respondent

Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The instant petition has been filed challenging the order of discharge dated 31.3.1994 (Ann.4) from Boarder Security Force (hereinafter called B.S.F.).

(2). The factual gamut of the case reveals that at the time of entering into service the petitioner was asked to fill up the form which contained in clause for furnishing information specifically whether he had ever been involved in a criminal case or not. The petitioner replied in no. On the basis of the said form the petitioners candidature was considered and he was enrolled in B.S.F. a disciplined force. On verification from the Collector, Jodhpur, it came to the knowledge of the respondents that the petitioner had been involved in a criminal case and after getting this report a show cause notice was issued to him and after considering his reply he was discharged from service vide order dated 31st March 1994 contained in Ann.4 to this writ petition. Hence this petition.

(3). The petitioner was specifically asked as what was the reason for furnishing the false information at that time to seeking appointment when he applied for the service on 7th August 1993 as the petitioner stood convicted vide judgment and order












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top