SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Kantichand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Jaipur – Respondent
(2). A few relevant facts leading to these proceedings may be noted at the out set. A writ petition was filed by Kanti Chand Sharma (for short KC) against the Muni- cipal Corporation Jaipur (for short MC) and others on November 18, 1996 with the averments that a plot owned and possessed by him is situated at Ambabadi Jaipur. He has been residing and carrying on business over the said plot after making construction for more than 34 years. The land in question has been surrounded by barbed wire fencing and water and electricity connection were installed over it. The open space of the said land has been covered by long and big trees. The MC issued licence in the name of KC for carrying his business. Till November 2, 1996 the said constructions were in existence but thereafter the MC smashed it and the belongings of KC were thrown in Amanishah Nalas and thereby KC was put to a loss of about 6 lacs. Certified copies of judgment and decree dated October 25, 1996 have also been annexed with the writ petition sh
12. U.O.I. vs. Smt. Darshan Devi (AIR 1997 SC 166)
2. Express News Papers vs. UOI (1986(1) SCC 133)
4. State of J & K vs. Haji Wali Mohd. (1972(2) SCC 402)
5. State of Haryana vs. Ram Kishan (1988(3) SCC 416)
6. Hari Singh vs. The M.E.O. (1972(2) SCC 239)
13. Annamalai Club vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu (1997(3) SCC 169)
7. Railway Board vs. M/s. Observer Publications (1972(3) SCR 865)
8. Ameerunnisa Begum vs. Mehboob Begum (1953 SCR 404)
9. Chiranjilal Chowdhari vs. UOI (1950 SCR 869)
11. Gopilal Teli vs. State (1995(2) WLC 1)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.