SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 434

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Kantichand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L. Pareek, for Petitioner P.C. Jain, for Respondents

Honble SHARMA, J.–As questions of law fall for consideration in both these petitions are identical, they were heard analogously and are proposed to be disposed of by a common order.

(2). A few relevant facts leading to these proceedings may be noted at the out set. A writ petition was filed by Kanti Chand Sharma (for short KC) against the Muni- cipal Corporation Jaipur (for short MC) and others on November 18, 1996 with the averments that a plot owned and possessed by him is situated at Ambabadi Jaipur. He has been residing and carrying on business over the said plot after making construction for more than 34 years. The land in question has been surrounded by barbed wire fencing and water and electricity connection were installed over it. The open space of the said land has been covered by long and big trees. The MC issued licence in the name of KC for carrying his business. Till November 2, 1996 the said constructions were in existence but thereafter the MC smashed it and the belongings of KC were thrown in Amanishah Nalas and thereby KC was put to a loss of about 6 lacs. Certified copies of judgment and decree dated October 25, 1996 have also been annexed with the writ petition sh




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top