B.S.CHAUHAN, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, B.J.SHETHNA
Chiman Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
``Dated 14.5.1999
S.B. Writ Petition No. 1688/83
Honble Shri V.G. PALSHIKAR, J.
Mr. D.S. Shishodia, for Appellant.
Mr. Vijay Vishnoi, for Respondent.
In this petition, the order of the Collector and other authorities is challenged on several grounds. The important question, however, which arises in this case is regarding jurisdiction of the Collector to invoke revisional powers under Section 27A of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 and the Rules made thereunder can be exercised at any time as the Section provides no limitation for such exercise. There are divergent view on the point and at least two contradictory judgments of the Single Bench including myself. I am of the view that though there is no period of limitation prescribed, the reasonable period as contemplated by the residury Article of the Indian Limitation Act would apply, conversely no limitation can apply is also a view taken by another Single Bench. Even Division Bench relying on the point may need harmonise co
10. Mohd. Kavi vs. Fatmabi Ibrahim (1997 (6) SCC 71)
4. Addl. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore vs. Thakoresas
5. Govt. of India vs. The Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals
6. State of Gujarat vs. Patel Raghav Natha and others (AIR 1969 SC 1297)
7. Mansa Ram vs. S.P. Pathak and others (AIR 1983 SC 1239)
8. Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs. Santa Singh & Ors. (AIR 1973 SC 2537)
9. Kerala State Electricity Board Trivendrum vs. T.P. Kunhaliumma (AIR 1977 SC 282)
1. Mangilal & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (1998 (1) WLC (Raj.) 625 = RLW 1997(3) Raj. 2017)
12. Anandi Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (1996(1) RLW 396)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.