SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 623

B.S.CHAUHAN
Naresh Bhansali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Mridul, Senior Advocate, with R.S. Saluja, for Petitioner J.P. Joshi and R.P. Dave, for Respondents

Honble Dr. CHAUHAN, J.–The instant writ petition has been filed for issuing direction to respondents to fill up the vacancies of Engineers as per the eligibility on the date of initial advertisement dated 18.1.1997.

(2). The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short, ``the Commission) advertised 444 posts of Assistant Engineers (Civil) in the Public Works Department (B & R), Irrigation and Public Health & Engineering Department under the provisions of the Rajasthan State Engineering Services (Direct Recruitment by Combined Competitive Examination) Rules, 1954. The last date for submitting the application, as per the said advertisement, had been 15.3.97. The said Rules stood amended vide order dated 22.1.97 providing for horizental reservation in favour of woman candidates. A corrigendum was issued by the Commission on 10.2.97 to give effect to the said amendment dated 22.1.97. The result of the examination was declared on 2.12.97 and petitioners name appeared in the select list. However, as the Commission realised that the orders dated 22.1.97 and 10.2.97 could not be implemented properly, it re-arranged the select l

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top